netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] be2net: replenish when posting to rx-queue is starved in out of mem conditions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090319.235537.207102449.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sathyap@...verengines.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] be2net: replenish when posting to rx-queue is
 starved in out of mem conditions

From: Sathya Perla <sathyap@...verengines.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:43:01 +0530

> Hi, this is a patch to replenish the rx-queue when it is in a starved
> state (due to out-of-mem conditions)
> 
> thanks,
> -Sathya
> P.S: Pls ignore the "company confidential" warning at the end of the
> patch emails.

Next you'll be sending us "P.P.S: Please ignore the P.S".

Saying this "ignore the confidential warning" just makes it even more
painful, it's yet another thing to "ignore".  Are there some legal
ramifications for you saying this?  I bet not, so what's the point?
The legalise still applies and it still consumes space in our inboxes.

It's extremely impolite, at the very best.

> Signed-off-by: Sathya Perla <sathyap@...verengines.com>

I'll apply your patches, but use gmail or something if you can't
make this annoying company confidential crap just go away, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html