netdev - [NET] net: reorder struct net_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49C36570.4010903@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:44:16 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [NET] net: reorder struct net_device_ops

David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:32:53 +0100
> 
>> There is no point to use prefetch() call here.
>> start_xmit() is a function like others...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
> 
> Yes but the operation pointer might not be in the CPU
> cache at this time?
> 
> And if it's not we can get it into the cpu whilst we do
> other processing, such as the dev_queue_xmit_nit() stuff.

This slow down fast path, but we can find a compromise.

I saw a strange effect on oprofile because of this prefetch()
on a situation we call xxx.xxx times per second dev_hard_start_xmit()
(So this ought to be in CPU cache already)

prefetch() is *free* only if the address computation is fast too :)

Thank you

[NET] net: reorder struct net_device_ops

Moving ndo_start_xmit() field at first position in
struct net_device_ops reduce the assembly needed to compute
the prefetch() address.

There seems to be an issue here on some cpus as spotted by oprofile
in dev_hard_start_xmit()
(prefetch() has a dependancy on previous add instruction)

	mov    %eax,-0x14(%ebp) /* store ops */
	add    $0x10,%eax       /* compute &ops->ndo_start_xmit */
	prefetcht0 (%eax)       /* stall here */

After patch, no add instruction is needed anymore.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index be3ebd7..e507c6e 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -547,14 +547,14 @@ struct netdev_queue {
  */
 #define HAVE_NET_DEVICE_OPS
 struct net_device_ops {
-	int			(*ndo_init)(struct net_device *dev);
-	void			(*ndo_uninit)(struct net_device *dev);
-	int			(*ndo_open)(struct net_device *dev);
-	int			(*ndo_stop)(struct net_device *dev);
 	int			(*ndo_start_xmit) (struct sk_buff *skb,
 						   struct net_device *dev);
 	u16			(*ndo_select_queue)(struct net_device *dev,
 						    struct sk_buff *skb);
+	int			(*ndo_init)(struct net_device *dev);
+	void			(*ndo_uninit)(struct net_device *dev);
+	int			(*ndo_open)(struct net_device *dev);
+	int			(*ndo_stop)(struct net_device *dev);
 #define HAVE_CHANGE_RX_FLAGS
 	void			(*ndo_change_rx_flags)(struct net_device *dev,
 						       int flags);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index c013031..2e5ebd0 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1670,7 +1670,7 @@ int dev_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 	const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
 	int rc;
 
-	prefetch(&dev->netdev_ops->ndo_start_xmit);
+	prefetch(&ops->ndo_start_xmit);
 	if (likely(!skb->next)) {
 		if (!list_empty(&ptype_all))
 			dev_queue_xmit_nit(skb, dev);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html