[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090321.132239.74116822.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dwmw2@...radead.org
Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/30] solos: Handle attribute show/store in kernel
more sanely
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:49:32 +0000
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 15:44 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Since these are generic, please use some form of netlink for this
> > instead of sysfs.
> >
> > Bonding was the first mistake (trying to use sysfs for a transactional
> > API).
> > Pls don't repeat the mistake.
>
> It's not a transactional API.
>
> The sysfs model actually fits the communication with the hardware almost
> perfectly -- there are a bunch of named parameters, all of which can be
> read and a few of which can be written to. A sysfs read or write
> translates directly into a single exchange with the device's firmware.
Fair enough, I'll pull this into net-next-2.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists