netdev - Re: Status update on Sun Neptune 10Gbit fibre using the NIU-driver.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49C669C8.70902@krogh.cc>
Date:	Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:39:36 +0100
From:	Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Status update on Sun Neptune 10Gbit fibre using the NIU-driver.

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Jesper Krogh a écrit :
>> Hi.
>>
>> Back in the 2.6.25/26-days .. (around 9 months ago) I had som stuggles
>> getting both performance and stabillity out of a Sun Neptune 10Gbit NIC
>> over fibre. The NIU driver blew up on the system under load but Matheos
>> Worku send me an internal Sun driver (nxge) that performed fairly well.
>> It peaked out around 800-850 MB/s .. it put a fairly high load on the
>> host system and peaked with over 300.000 cs/s (both numbers measured
>> with dstat).
>>
>> Today I got around to tesing the NIU(2.6.27.20) driver again. Having
>> repeated the test I did last summer I couldn't get it to "blow up". But
>> instead of the ~500MB/s i got out of it last summer, it peaks at 940MB/s
>> now and the load on the host is nearly invisible (<2) .. cs rates less
>> than 10K mostly.
>>
>> I'm not using any kind of Jumbo frames in the setup.
>>
>> I'll keep it up on the niu-driver for now and report back if it
>> encounters any problems.
>>
>> In the test .. I do dd over NFS, default exports, default mount options
>> .. dd have "bs" set to either 1M or to 512 (to try to stress the NFS
>> server). I have tried to put cpu-load in the NFS-server while running
>> the NFS-server and pushing some data around on them memory subsystem
>> while doing it.
>>
>> This is just excellent..  (crossing fingers that it can beat the 180
>> days of uptime the nxge-driver got).
>>
>> Link to old struggles:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/677545
>>
>> Jesper
> 
> Yes I remember this stuff. David added multi tx queue support in last July
> (for 2.6.27)

Can there be something about "fairness" changed? While producing the 
screenshot to you below I got this one on the server:
do_ypcall: clnt_call: RPC: Unable to send; errno = No buffer space available

So NIS wasn't able to get throgh..

> Could you post more information please, about load on individual cpus
>  for example ? (top snapshot with one line per cpu)

http://krogh.cc/~jesper/top.png

> Is NFS using TCP or UDP on your setup ?

TCP.

> An interesting test would be the reverse path (transmit from clients to
> this server)

Thats harder to setup and not be "disk IO-bound on the server". Perhaps 
exporting a RAM-disk and write into that?

> Also, testing 2.6.29 could be interesting, since UDP receive
> path doesnt need to use a global rwlock anymore.

I'll put that on my todo list..

-- 
Jesper
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html