[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090321.190947.16125988.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sfc: Work around unreliable legacy interrupt status
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:26:41 +0000
> In rare cases, reading the legacy interrupt status register can
> acknowledge an event queue whose attention flag has not yet been set
> in the register. Until we service this event queue it will not
> generate any more interrupts. Therefore, as a secondary check, poll
> the next slot in each active event queue whose flag is not set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists