[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49C836D0.1080304@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:26:40 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
CC: Bastian Blank <waldi@...ian.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Use request_firmware()
Michael Chan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:14 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
>
>>Michael Chan wrote:
>>
>>>May be I'll break up each firmware section into a
>>>different file and the file name will be updated with each version.
>>>This will allow different sections to be updated separately and older
>>>kernels will still have access to the older firmware.
>>
>>Is that really necessary? It is enough "fun" finding just the one firmware file
>>as it is.
>
>
> If all the firmware sections are in the same file, much of the firmware
> file will be duplicated in a new file when we update just one section.
So? Perhaps I'm just experiencing distro pain which may not continue to exist or
which may not matter to netdev, but when one is installing to a system that uses
a core NIC which has firmware cast-out into "non-free" siberia, life is "fun"
enough making sure one has the one firmware file let alone N of them. If I now
have to make sure I have all N firmware files, and they are to be updated
separately, either that means I have to find N packages, or the distros are going
to package them into one "uber" package that might as well be a single firmware
file anyway.
rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists