[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090324042723.GJ3051@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:27:23 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
Bastian Blank <waldi@...ian.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Use request_firmware()
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:26 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> Michael Chan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:14 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> >
> >>Michael Chan wrote:
> >>
> >>>May be I'll break up each firmware section into a
> >>>different file and the file name will be updated with each version.
> >>>This will allow different sections to be updated separately and older
> >>>kernels will still have access to the older firmware.
> >>
> >>Is that really necessary? It is enough "fun" finding just the one firmware file
> >>as it is.
> >
> >
> > If all the firmware sections are in the same file, much of the firmware
> > file will be duplicated in a new file when we update just one section.
>
> So? Perhaps I'm just experiencing distro pain which may not continue to exist or
> which may not matter to netdev, but when one is installing to a system that uses
> a core NIC which has firmware cast-out into "non-free" siberia, life is "fun"
> enough making sure one has the one firmware file let alone N of them.
[...]
If you're referring to Debian, that is exactly what Bastian and I are
working on. Sourceless firmware is considered non-free, but it can
still be packaged, as the bnx2 firmware already has been. We've also
had some discussions with David Woodhouse about semi-automatically
packaging all of the firmware that's now in the firmware subdirectory
and is clearly licensed.
Ben.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists