[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49CA6AAA.1050305@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:32:26 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Holger Eitzenberger <holger@...zenberger.org>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/6] netfilter: limit the length of the helper name
Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> This is necessary in order to have an upper bound for Netlink
> message calculation, which is not a problem at all, as there
> are no helpers with a longer name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Holger Eitzenberger <holger@...zenberger.org>
>
> Index: net-next-2.6/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.h
> ===================================================================
> --- net-next-2.6.orig/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.h
> +++ net-next-2.6/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>
> struct module;
>
> +#define NF_CT_HELPER_NAME_LEN 16
> +
> struct nf_conntrack_helper
> {
> struct hlist_node hnode; /* Internal use. */
> Index: net-next-2.6/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c
> ===================================================================
> --- net-next-2.6.orig/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c
> +++ net-next-2.6/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ int nf_conntrack_helper_register(struct
>
> BUG_ON(me->expect_policy == NULL);
> BUG_ON(me->expect_class_max >= NF_CT_MAX_EXPECT_CLASSES);
> + BUG_ON(strlen(me->name) >= NF_CT_HELPER_NAME_LEN - 1);
This appears to be an off-by-one. A strlen of exactly
NF_CT_HELPER_NAME_LEN - 1 would be fine, right?
No need to resend, just let me know whether I should change it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists