lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49CA74CA.1040603@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:15:38 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC:	mbizon@...ebox.fr, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@...nsmode.se>,
	avorontsov@...mvista.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] conntrack: use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU for nf_conn structs

Patrick McHardy a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Hi Patrick
>>
>> Here is the patch I had the time to test this time...
>> No problem so far on my machine.
>> I did a UDP flood stress.
> 
> Thanks Eric. Most parts looks good, just two questions below:
> 
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c
>> b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c
>> index 6ba5c55..fcbcf62 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c
>> @@ -25,30 +25,30 @@ struct ct_iter_state {
>>      unsigned int bucket;
>>  };
>>  
>> -static struct hlist_node *ct_get_first(struct seq_file *seq)
>> +static struct hlist_nulls_node *ct_get_first(struct seq_file *seq)
>>  {
>>      struct net *net = seq_file_net(seq);
>>      struct ct_iter_state *st = seq->private;
>> -    struct hlist_node *n;
>> +    struct hlist_nulls_node *n;
>>  
>>      for (st->bucket = 0;
>>           st->bucket < nf_conntrack_htable_size;
>>           st->bucket++) {
>>          n = rcu_dereference(net->ct.hash[st->bucket].first);
>> -        if (n)
>> +        if (!is_a_nulls(n))
>>              return n;
>>      }
>>      return NULL;
>>  }
> 
> Don't we need to make sure the entry is not reused while dumping
> it?
> 

Ah yes, I forgot that for UDP/TCP I had to change locking on this part.
Because messing with reference count was crazy...
But in UDP/TCP we have different spinlock for each chain, so hold time
was small enough.

So I guess that with central conntrack lock, we need to take references on entries
while dumping them.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ