netdev - Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Rework the TX logic.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:03:54 +0300
From:	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To:	Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
Cc:	leoli@...escale.com, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Rework the TX logic.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 06:44:05PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> The line:
>  if ((bd == ugeth->txBd[txQ]) && (netif_queue_stopped(dev) == 0))
>        break;
> in ucc_geth_tx() didn not make sense to me. Rework & cleanup
> this logic to something understandable.
> ---
> 
> Reworked the patch according to Antons comments.
> 
>  drivers/net/ucc_geth.c |   66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
> index 7fc91aa..465de3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
> @@ -161,6 +161,17 @@ static struct ucc_geth_info ugeth_primary_info = {
>  
>  static struct ucc_geth_info ugeth_info[8];
>  
> +
> +static inline u32 __iomem *bd2buf(u8 __iomem *bd)
> +{
> +	return (u32 __iomem *)(bd+4);

Spaces around "+"...

Also, now it's obvious that we're just reading status or buf.

So instead of these inlines we could use struct qe_bd as described
in asm/qe.h.

I.e.

struct qe_bd *bd = ...;

in_be32(&bd->buf);
in_be16(&bd->status);

Oh, wait. We can't, ucc_geth assumes status is u32, which includes
the length field, i.e. ucc_fast.h defines:

#define T_W     0x20000000

:-(

The cleanup work surely desires a separate patch, so bd2buf and
bd2status are OK, for now.

I'll test the patch as soon as I'll get some QE board back on
my table (actually I have one QE board handy, but it's a 1GHz
one, while I'd like to test the patch on a slow machine, where
we'll actually see performance regressions).

[...]
> +               tx_ind = (tx_ind + 1) & TX_RING_MOD_MASK(ugeth->ug_info->bdRingLenTx[txQ]);

Line over 80 columns.

[...]
> +       if (num_freed)
> +               netif_wake_queue(dev); /* We freed some buffers, so restart transmission */

Ditto.

Please make sure your patches pass scripts/checkpatch.pl.

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html