netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v3] igbvf: add new driver to support 82576 virtual functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090325.203350.213208960.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rdreier@...co.com
Cc:	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gospo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3] igbvf: add new driver to support 82576
 virtual functions

From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:21:08 -0700

> The igbvf driver doesn't proliferate any mistake.  The num_vfs sysfs
> attribute that everyone finds so objectionable is in the igb driver, and
> if you follow the patchwork URL that was provided, you would see that
> you applied the patch adding it back in February.  The only thing the
> igbvf driver does relating to this is bind to the PCI ID of the virtual
> functions created by the igb driver.

I am saying I made a mistake when merging that.

Can we continue forward now?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html