netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.30

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090327.145840.218658417.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	paul.moore@...com
Cc:	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
	etienne.basset@...ericable.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.30

From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:10:20 -0400

> This patchset wraps up all the new labeled networking bits for 2.6.30.  This
> is mostly a fixup/cleanup release with the main focus being to correct the
> TCP labeling of both SELinux and Smack; expect some of this to get backported
> to the -stable trees but there will need to be a bit of rework first so it
> may take a few weeks for that to happen.  Other than the TCP issue there is a
> new Smack feature to configure CIPSO aware hosts in "/smack/netlabel" which
> should make the host/network label configuration much more flexible.  The last
> change is to get rid of the security_socket_post_accept() hook which isn't
> currently being used by anything in-tree and seems to act as a magnet for
> bad ideas; if things change we can always add it back later.

Is James Morris going to take this stuff?  Just curious...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html