netdev - Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49CF62A2.6050803@netfilter.org>
Date:	Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:59:30 +0200
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	gorcunov@...il.com, randy.dunlap@...cle.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)

David Miller wrote:
> From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:47:04 +0400
> 
>> [Randy Dunlap - Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:26:42PM -0700]
>> ... 
>> | works_for_me.  Thanks.
>> | but missing S-O-B.
>> | 
>> | Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>> ...
>>
>> Thanks for testing Randy. So if nobody will complain
>> here is a solid version of the patch. Though I would like
>> if Pablo or Patrick confirm its correctness. Thanks!
> 
> I'll apply this once Patrick or Pablo have a look at it.

I think that the patch attached is better since it removes the overhead
of the IPv6 dependency, which is indeed too much for the use of one
function. Thanks.

-- 
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers

View attachment "x.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (1679 bytes)