[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D1052D.2050609@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:45:17 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
CC: Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pku.leo@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Rework the TX logic.
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com> wrote on 30/03/2009 19:22:03:
>> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>> gianfar does not seem to use in_/out_ functions for the BDs. Works
> just
>>> fine that too it seems.
>> It does now that it has explicit barriers in a few places. Before they
>
> In 2.6.29 or later?
No, it was earlier.
>> were added, it would sometimes fail under load. That was due to a
>> compiler reordering, but CPU reordering was possible as well.
>
> Does not the CPU skip reordering if the guarded bit is set?
The guarded bit is typically not set for DMA buffers. ucc_geth is a bit
different since descriptors are in MURAM which is ioremap()ed -- though
switching to a cacheable mapping with barriers should be a performance
improvement.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists