[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090330.133648.202747210.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: Joakim.Tjernlund@...nsmode.se
Cc: leoli@...escale.com, avorontsov@...mvista.com,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pku.leo@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Move freeing of TX packets to NAPI context.
From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:01:33 +0200
> I don't know. But the question you should ask is: Does the networking
> code promise this now and for the future? If not, you should
> fix the driver not to relay on netif_queue_stopped() here.
Stop this nonsense talk.
If the driver can't be the one and only controller of the TX queue
state, everything would essentially explode.
The fact is, it does.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists