netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49D3D88E.3090009@novell.com>
Date:	Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:11:42 -0400
From:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
CC:	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	agraf@...e.de, pmullaney@...ell.com, pmorreale@...ell.com,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

Chris Wright wrote:
> And more stuff in the kernel can come at the potential cost of weakening
> protection/isolation.
>   
Note that the design of vbus should prevent any weakening...though if
you see a hole, please point it out.

(On that front, note that I still have some hardening to do, such as not
calling BUG_ON() in venet-tap if the ring is in a funk, etc)

Regards,
-Greg


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (258 bytes)