netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:52:51 -0400
From:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	anthony@...emonkey.ws, andi@...stfloor.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agraf@...e.de, pmullaney@...ell.com,
	pmorreale@...ell.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
>   
>
>>  there will *never* be another packet in the queue
>> at this point, since it wasn't running.
>>   
>>     
> Yep, and I'll be the first to admit that my design only looks forward. 
>   
To clarify, I am referring to the internal design of the venet-tap
only.  The general vbus architecture makes no such policy decisions.

-Greg


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (258 bytes)