netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:51:53 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	Patrick Mullaney <pmullaney@...ell.com>, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
	andi@...stfloor.org, Peter Morreale <PMorreale@...ell.com>,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, agraf@...e.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 06:49:22PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> I still think you want one MSI per device rather than one MSI per vbus,  
>> to avoid scaling problems on large guest.  After Herbert's let loose on  
>> the code, one MSI per queue.
>>     
>
> Yes, one MSI per TX queue, and one per RX queue :)
>
>   

We're currently limited to 1024, so go wild :)

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html