[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090406200025.67cc558a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:00:25 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM question...
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:30:26 -0400
Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org> wrote:
> Although there was some discussion
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/680723
>
> about removing IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM from the remaining network drivers in May of
> 2008, but they still appears to be there in 2.6.29.
These are mostly unmaintained drivers. Dunno why tg3 isn't fixed - it has
some mitigation logic so maybe its not observable
> I can put a scope/analyser on a device - and look at the touchscreens, serial
> devices, USB, all without cracking the case.
But you can observe a network interface accurately from all over the lan
(and with a ten dollar card), or a good deal further (I believe up to 1Km
in the right conditions was claimed by some
If you need absolute hard entropy then use a real entropy source, if not
then your user space is using the wrong device file - the blocking for
entropy one. At that point it depends how vital your SSL is to you and
what it protects.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists