netdev - Re: [PATCH -next] sfc: Don't specify unexistent IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090408.160002.119907202.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com,
	khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] sfc: Don't specify unexistent IRQ

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:38:20 +0100

> Neither the lm90 driver nor the lm87 driver do support interrupts, so
> there is no point in specifying one when declaring the devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html