netdev - Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18913.53699.544083.320542@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date:	Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:34:27 +1000
From:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, shemminger@...tta.com,
	jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, dada1@...mosbay.com, jengelh@...ozas.de,
	kaber@...sh.net, r000n@...0n.net,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: iptables very slow after commit
	784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49

Paul E. McKenney writes:

> If the generic implementation is needed only on !SMP systems, that
> could work.  The architectures I would be worried about include
> powerpc and ia64, which I believe support 32-bit SMP builds.

32-bit powerpc doesn't have 64-bit atomic operations and does support
SMP.

What about ARM?  I thought they had 32-bit SMP these days as well.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html