[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090412173108.GO6822@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:31:08 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, shemminger@...tta.com,
jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, dada1@...mosbay.com, jengelh@...ozas.de,
kaber@...sh.net, r000n@...0n.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: iptables very slow after commit
784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 09:34:27PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney writes:
>
> > If the generic implementation is needed only on !SMP systems, that
> > could work. The architectures I would be worried about include
> > powerpc and ia64, which I believe support 32-bit SMP builds.
>
> 32-bit powerpc doesn't have 64-bit atomic operations and does support
> SMP.
>
> What about ARM? I thought they had 32-bit SMP these days as well.
Some of Steve Hemminger's recent suggestions in this thread seem to me
to avoid this whole issue nicely. But we will see! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists