netdev - Re: Null dereference in uli526x_rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090413024505.GC13090@lackof.org>
Date:	Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:45:05 -0600
From:	Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	grundler@...isc-linux.org, kyle@...artin.ca,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, error27@...il.com
Subject: Re: Null dereference in uli526x_rx_packet()

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:59:31PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:35:13 -0600
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:23:32PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:47:54PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > > > > I don't know if the right fix is to return like this patch does or to set 
> > > > > skb = rxptr->rx_skb_ptr again.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Ick... that's a good catch. I'll have to think about this.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I think this is alright, it at least keeps the original intent of the
> > > code. I don't pretend to have figured it out yet though.
> > > 
> > > I'll stare more at this Monday...
> > > 
> > > I guess the real question is does anyone still have one of these
> > > cards. I don't think I do, just the proper tulips. :/
> > 
> > Ditto. AFAIK, I only have tulips.
> > 
> > Patch below looks right to me. Clobbering the skb is certainly wrong.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
> 
> It looks correct to me, can we get a proper submission with
> signoffs etc.?

Dave,
Is that something I have to do or the original submitter?
Was the "Acked-by" appropriate for me to provide (as maintainer)?
I can resubmit with Signed-off-by if that's what is expected.

thanks,
grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html