[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090414020015.GC11615@xw6200.broadcom.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:00:15 -0700
From: "Matt Carlson" <mcarlson@...adcom.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: "Matthew Carlson" <mcarlson@...adcom.com>,
"James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tg3: fix big endian MAC address collection failure
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 06:40:35PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Matt Carlson" <mcarlson@...adcom.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:25:48 -0700
>
> > Michael noticed that your NVRAM signature is byteswapped in NVRAM. (!)
> > That also explains why the driver is trying to obtain the MAC address
> > through NVRAM, rather than getting it from shared memory. The device's
> > bootcode is not working correctly.
>
> If this problem is pervasive, which it seems it is since we
> have at least two people hitting this problem, we'll need
> to find a way to handle it without saying "update your
> BIOS or system firmware"
Well, Robin's problem looks distinctly different than James'. I believe
Robin's problem has to do with the legacy EEPROM access routines. The
patchset may have overlooked something in that area. I just need to
gather evidence to prove it.
I did run some tests this afternoon on a similar IA64 HP machine and
they ran fine. Consequently, I'm optimistic that James' problem is local
to his machine. If this turns out to be a wider problem, then I agree
we'll need to find an appropriate solution.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists