[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090414.164340.06293708.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: duncan.gibb@...iusit.co.uk
Cc: fubar@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 ALB bonding printk()s every arp
From: Duncan Gibb <duncan.gibb@...iusit.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:15:04 +0100
> On 05 Nov 2008 at 01:51, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> if (arp->op_code == htons(ARPOP_REPLY)) {
>> /* update rx hash table for this ARP */
>> + printk("rar: update orig %s bond_dev %s\n", orig_dev->name,
>> + bond_dev->name);
>> + bond = bond_dev->priv;
>> rlb_update_entry_from_arp(bond, arp);
>> dprintk("Server received an ARP Reply from client\n");
>> }
>
> Is the printk() in this patch necessary?
>
> We recently put a 2.6.29 kernel on a router with multiple ALB bonds each
> of several e1000 devices. It now generates a log entry every time an
> arp is-at packet arrives at a bonded interface. I'm not sure that's a
> feature...
That's pretty annoying. Jay can we just remove this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists