[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904160809.56228.alexandre.sidorenko@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:09:56 -0400
From: Alex Sidorenko <alexandre.sidorenko@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: "jarkao2@...il.com" <jarkao2@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: An inconsistency/bug in ingress netem timestamps
On April 16, 2009 06:10:34 am David Miller wrote:
> Since IFB completely bypasses netif_rx() and netif_receive_skb() I
> think it should unconditionally set skb->tstamp.tv64 to zero and
> invoke net_timestamp()
>From ifb.c (2.6.29):
109 if (from & AT_EGRESS) {
110 dp->st_rx_frm_egr++;
111 dev_queue_xmit(skb);
112 } else if (from & AT_INGRESS) {
113 dp->st_rx_frm_ing++;
114 skb_pull(skb, skb->dev->hard_header_len);
115 netif_rx(skb);
116 }
Adding skb->tstamp.tv64 = 0 between lines 114 and 115 made 'ping' report the
delay as expected (tested on 2.6.28)
Alex
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexandre Sidorenko email: asid@...com
WTEC Linux Hewlett-Packard (Canada)
------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists