netdev - Re: more findings/questions on vlans/bonds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49E73E06.5030708@Voltaire.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:17:42 +0300
From:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...taire.com>
To:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: more findings/questions on vlans/bonds

>> I played a bit with bonding vlans (2.6.29 active-backup mode) and it
>> doesn't seem to work - specifically, I noted that bonding doesn't issue
>> fail-over after I changed the current slave link status to down ("ifconfig
>> eth0.4001 down"). I suspect that the carrier based link monitoring scheme
>> is broken wrt to vlan devices 
[...]
>> I also played with a post 2.6.29 cut of Linus tree, and I couldn't bond vlans.

Hi Jay, 

Did you had the chance to look into the bonding-vlan-devices related issues
I came across when doing these tests?

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html