[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1239976872.5297.15.camel@deadeye.i.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:01:12 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix GRO for multiple page fragments
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 01:27 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:04:20 +0100
>
> > This loop over fragments in napi_fraginfo_skb() was "interesting".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> > ---
> > This is not tested, as only cxgb3 will currently pass in multiple
> > fragments at the same time. skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags would already be
> > 0 but it makes no sense to rely on that. I hope I'm not missing some
> > subtlety...
>
> I think the code still isn't right after your changes.
>
> The intent seems to be to append frags from 'info' into the SKB,
> so that it works even if the SKB already has some frags.
[...]
This function is setting up a 'new' skb from the fragments it's given.
To avoid allocation overhead it recycles skbs via napi->skb if they are
merged (or otherwise discarded). There should be no data attached to
the recycled skb.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists