[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090417012544.GB16126@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:25:44 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc2-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.29
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> I think you put this in the wrong regression pile:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13112
> > Subject : Oops in drain_array
> > Submitter : Bart <mmx@....pl>
> > Date : 2009-04-14 10:21 (3 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123970493224628&w=4
>
> Hmm. This one seems like it should be in the "since 2.6.28" camp, since if
> I read that one right, it happens with 2.6.29.1.
>
> (I mean sure, it might be new since 2.6.29, but it sounds more likely that
> it's already in 2.6.29)
I'd suspect it's possibly hardware related:
http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=free_block&btnG=Function+Search
Look at the very similar call signatures - spanning almost all
kernels back to v2.6.16. There's one spike at .27 - perhaps the same
box trying up hard and crashing several times - or a popular distro
kernel?
Or it's a really ancient bug going back to v2.6.16.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists