netdev - Re: [PATCH] loopback: packet drops accounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loopback: packet drops accounting

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:56:57 +0200

> We can in some situations drop packets in netif_rx()
> 
> loopback driver does not report these (unlikely) drops to its stats,
> and incorrectly change packets/bytes counts.
> 
> After this patch applied, "ifconfig lo" can reports these drops as in :
> 
> # ifconfig lo
> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>           RX packets:692562900 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:692562900 errors:3228 dropped:3228 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:2865674174 (2.6 GiB)  TX bytes:2865674174 (2.6 GiB)
> 
> I chose to reflect those errors only in tx_dropped/tx_errors, and not mirror
> these errors in rx_dropped/rx_errors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>

Well, logically the receive is what failed, not the transmit.

I think it's therefore misleading to count it as a TX drop.

Do you feel strongly about this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html