[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090421200958.GD9577@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:09:58 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] snmp: add missing counters for RFC 4293
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:58:51PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Neil Horman a écrit :
> > The IP MIB (RFC 4293) defines stats for InOctets, OutOctets, InMcastOctets and
> > OutMcastOctets:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4293
> > But it seems we don't track those in any way that easy to separate from other
> > protocols. This patch adds those missing counters to the stats file. Tested
> > successfully by me
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> >
> >
> > include/linux/snmp.h | 4 ++++
> > net/ipv4/ip_input.c | 4 ++++
> > net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 3 +++
> > net/ipv4/proc.c | 4 ++++
> > net/ipv6/ip6_input.c | 4 ++++
> > net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 8 ++++++++
> > net/ipv6/mcast.c | 9 +++++++++
> > net/ipv6/ndisc.c | 3 +++
> > net/ipv6/proc.c | 4 ++++
> > net/ipv6/raw.c | 6 ++++++
> > 10 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/snmp.h b/include/linux/snmp.h
> > index aee3f1e..95c17f6 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/snmp.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/snmp.h
> > @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ enum
> > {
> > IPSTATS_MIB_NUM = 0,
> > IPSTATS_MIB_INRECEIVES, /* InReceives */
> > + IPSTATS_MIB_INOCTETS, /* InOctets */
> > + IPSTATS_MIB_INMCASTOCTETS, /* InMcastOctets */
> > IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS, /* InHdrErrors */
> > IPSTATS_MIB_INTOOBIGERRORS, /* InTooBigErrors */
> > IPSTATS_MIB_INNOROUTES, /* InNoRoutes */
> > @@ -29,6 +31,8 @@ enum
> > IPSTATS_MIB_INDELIVERS, /* InDelivers */
> > IPSTATS_MIB_OUTFORWDATAGRAMS, /* OutForwDatagrams */
> > IPSTATS_MIB_OUTREQUESTS, /* OutRequests */
> > + IPSTATS_MIB_OUTOCTETS, /* OutOctets */
> > + IPSTATS_MIB_OUTMCASTOCTETS, /* OutMcastOctets */
> > IPSTATS_MIB_OUTDISCARDS, /* OutDiscards */
> > IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES, /* OutNoRoutes */
> > IPSTATS_MIB_REASMTIMEOUT, /* ReasmTimeout */
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> > index 1a58a6f..bc9169b 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> > @@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ int ip_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct packet_type *pt,
> > goto drop;
> >
> > IP_INC_STATS_BH(dev_net(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_INRECEIVES);
> > + IP_ADD_STATS_BH(dev_net(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_INOCTETS, skb->len);
> >
> > if ((skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL) {
> > IP_INC_STATS_BH(dev_net(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_INDISCARDS);
> > @@ -396,6 +397,9 @@ int ip_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct packet_type *pt,
> >
> > iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> >
> > + if (ipv4_is_multicast(iph->daddr))
> > + IP_ADD_STATS_BH(dev_net(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_INMCASTOCTETS, skb->len);
> > +
> > /*
> > * RFC1122: 3.2.1.2 MUST silently discard any IP frame that fails the checksum.
> > *
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > index 3e7e910..8a68dc2 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ int ip_mc_output(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > * If the indicated interface is up and running, send the packet.
> > */
>
> > IP_INC_STATS(dev_net(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_OUTREQUESTS);
> > + IP_ADD_STATS_BH(dev_net(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_OUTOCTETS, skb->len);
> > + IP_ADD_STATS_BH(dev_net(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_OUTMCASTOCTETS, skb->len);
>
> So you use the _BH variant right after IP_INC_STATS() ?
> Which one is right (or which one is false ?)
>
Both are correct (right now), at least as far as I can tell. I'm not 100% sure why ADD
was named ADD_BH, except for the fact that it doesn't toggle the use of the mib
array passed in. I think the right solution would be to simply rename
IP_ADD_STATS_BH to IP_ADD_STATS, and modify its implementation to access
mib[!in_softirq()] rather than just mib[0]. I had planned to do this in a
followup cleanup patch. Alternatively, I could add a new IP_ADD_STATS to be
complete, but I don't really see the advantage (asside from not checking
in_softirq quite as often).
Same with all the other cases below.
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists