[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0904211642320.31780@qirst.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:43:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Johann Baudy <johann.baudy@...-log.net>
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TX_RING and packet mmap
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Johann Baudy wrote:
> >> Could you clean then states up a bit to reflect what they actually mean?
> >>
> >> TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE => Frame is available
> >> TP_STATUS_SEND_REQUEST => Frame waits for sending
> >> TP_STATUS_SENDING => Frame is being sent.
> >
> > Ok
>
> Do you suggest to replace previous TP_STATUS_KERNEL with TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE?
> or Add a new status?
Well yes. But I guess you know best what to call them. Just make them
more decriptive of their function.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists