netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] tun: fix aio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090421.060246.150234623.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	m.s.tsirkin@...il.com
Cc:	mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tun: fix aio

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m.s.tsirkin@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:50:21 +0300

> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:25:27PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> The following patches make tun_chr_aio_read and tun_chr_aio_write not modify
>> the iovec so that io_submit/io_getevents succeed, becoming functionally
>> equivalent to write/read on the device.
> 
> What are the thoughts on these patches?
> Is this a reasonable thing to do?

Man, you're real impatient.

I just applied your patches to net-next-2.6 and was going to let you
know that I had done this.

Sit tight next time, if you changes are under review they'll be
happily sitting right here:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/

where you can monitor their status until they're either applied
or rejected.

:-P
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html