netdev - Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and security_socket_post_recv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090421.225202.218457438.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp
Cc:	paul.moore@...com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and
 security_socket_post_recv_datagram().

From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:38:04 +0900

> If TOMOYO is allowed to make policy decisions based on the "task_struct" who
> picks up the connection/datagram, the only possible approach is to introduce
> security_socket_post_accept() and security_socket_post_recv_datagram().

Fine.

FWIW I do not agree with TOMOYO conceptually.  But if people are
generally going to let such a scheme into the kernel, I guess
I have to accept these socket layer hacks :-/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html