netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] e1000/e1000e/igb/ixgb: do not use netif_wake

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090422.004840.142633147.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com,
	jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] e1000/e1000e/igb/ixgb: do not use
 netif_wake_queue un-necessarily

From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:42:05 -0700

> It was pointed out that the Intel wired ethernet drivers do not need to
> wake the tx queue since netif_carrier_on/off will take care of the qdisc
> management in order to guarantee the correct handling of the transmit
> routine enable state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>

Applied to net-next-2.6, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html