[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49EF040C.6070401@imap.cc>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:48:28 +0200
From:	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	isdn4linux@...tserv.isdn4linux.de, isdn@...ux-pingi.de,
	i4ldeveloper@...tserv.isdn4linux.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:31:42 -0700 (PDT), David Miller wrote:
> From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:18:52 +0200 (CEST)
> 
>> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ INTERFACE
>>  	- description of isdn4linux Link Level and Hardware Level interfaces.
>>  INTERFACE.fax
>>  	- description of the fax subinterface of isdn4linux.
>> +INTERFACE.CAPI
>> +	- description of kernel CAPI Link Level to Hardware Level interface.
>>  README
>>  	- general info on what you need and what to do for Linux ISDN.
>>  README.FAQ
> 
> There is no INTERFACE.fax entry in this file in the current
> tree.
> 
> I wanted to apply this, but aparently your patch is against
> something other than Linus's tree or net-2.6
It applies on top of my mis-dated patch
Subject: [PATCH v2] update Documentation/isdn/00-INDEX
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:01:32 +0100
which I sent in fact on 7 Apr 2009. Somehow I thought you had
already applied that.
If it helps, I can re-send that one with the correct date, or
alternatively merge both of these patches into one.
Regards,
Tilman
-- 
Tilman Schmidt                    E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (251 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
