netdev - Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and security_socket_post_recv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m2eivjtojp.fsf@ssh.synack.fr>
Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:47:22 +0200
From:	Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, paul.moore@...com,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and security_socket_post_recv_datagram().

Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> writes:

> There could be some programs which get confused by accept()/recvmsg() returning
> an error when poll() said "connections are ready" or "datagrams are ready".
> If we find such programs, we can tell TOMOYO to disable filtering for such
> programs.

Hello Tetsuo,

this will introduce a way to bypass the security system (?)

If TOMOYO won't filter such programs, people may add this "poll()"
feature to their code, in order to escape the security system.

I think it's strange for a security system to allow some programs
because of specific code issue, and not because of security reasons.

sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html