netdev - Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and security_socket_post_recv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200904240526.n3O5QO01039109@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
Date:	Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:26:24 +0900
From:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	paul.moore@...com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, greg@...kko.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and security_socket_post_recv_datagram().

OK. I understood that security_socket_post_recv_datagram() must not return
-EAGAIN if a process calls recvmsg() after poll() said "ready".
That will be also true for security_socket_recvmsg().


Is it OK for security_socket_recvmsg()/security_socket_accept() to return
an error other than -EAGAIN?
(In other words, security_socket_recvmsg()/security_socket_accept() errors are
one of "hard" errors?)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html