lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65634d660904271248p133717aam55751fc435f9fd3e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:48:57 -0700
From:	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Question about locks in qdisc_restart

In qdisc_restart the qdisc lock is released before taking the
netif_tx_lock, and only acquired again after unlocking the
netif_tx_lock.  There's a comment with the function that
"qdisc_lock(q) and netif_tx_lock are mutually exclusive, if one is
grabbed, another must be free."  Can anyone tell me the motivation for
this restriction?  We are seeing some performance improvements by
holding the lock through qdisc_restart, and I'm not sure why this
would be bad to do.

Thanks,
Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ