[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090427122316.1a8fec91.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:23:16 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gianfar: irq_of_parse_and_map() error unnoticed
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:05:30 +0200
Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com> wrote:
> priv->interruptTransmit, -Receive and -Error are unsigned, so the error path
> wasn't taken when irq_of_parse_and_map() returned an incorrect irq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> index b2c4967..55c2ce8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> @@ -203,9 +203,9 @@ static int gfar_of_init(struct net_device *dev)
>
> priv->interruptError = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 2);
>
> - if (priv->interruptTransmit < 0 ||
> - priv->interruptReceive < 0 ||
> - priv->interruptError < 0) {
> + if (priv->interruptTransmit == NO_IRQ ||
> + priv->interruptReceive == NO_IRQ ||
> + priv->interruptError == NO_IRQ) {
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto err_out;
> }
I guess that's OK, as gianfar.c appears to be a ppc-only thing, and ppc
does implement NO_IRQ.
However what a lot (all) rtc drivers do is
if (irq <= 0)
which (afaik) will dtrt in all cases: NO_IRQ==0, NO_IRQ<0,
!defined(NO_IRQ).
Then again, it will dtwt if the platform allows irq numbers of zero.
argh, how did we get into this pickle?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists