[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1240930084.10689.39.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:48:04 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@...x.dk>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sfc: Make temperature warnings/alarms more explicit.
The sfc driver can detect different hardware failures via the
LM87 system. One of the failures I have experienced is the
temperature alarm, but the error message didn't reveal that this
error was temperature related. I had to read the code to
discover that.
I think that the temperature error should be more explicit, in
order to warn people before the board is permanently damaged.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk>
---
drivers/net/sfc/boards.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/boards.c b/drivers/net/sfc/boards.c
index 4a4c74c..b1822fe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/boards.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/boards.c
@@ -121,8 +121,10 @@ static int efx_check_lm87(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned mask)
if (alarms1 || alarms2) {
EFX_ERR(efx,
"LM87 detected a hardware failure (status %02x:%02x)"
- "%s%s\n",
+ "%s%s%s\n",
alarms1, alarms2,
+ (alarms1 & (LM87_ALARM_TEMP_INT|LM87_ALARM_TEMP_EXT1))
+ ? " high temperature" : "",
(alarms1 & LM87_ALARM_TEMP_INT) ? " INTERNAL" : "",
(alarms1 & LM87_ALARM_TEMP_EXT1) ? " EXTERNAL" : "");
return -ERANGE;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists