netdev - Re: htb parallelism on multi-core platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:03:26 +0300
From:	Radu Rendec <radu.rendec@...s.ro>
To:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...u.dk>
Cc:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
	Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: htb parallelism on multi-core platforms

On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 12:31 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Just noticed that Jeremy Kerr has made some python scripts to make it even 
> easier to use oprofile.
> See http://ozlabs.org/~jk/diary/tech/linux/hiprofile-v1.0.diary/

Thanks for the hint; I'll have a look at the scripts too.

> I would rather want to see the output from cls_u32.ko
> 
> opreport --symbols -cl cls_u32.ko --image-path=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/

samples  %        image name               symbol name
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
38424    100.000  cls_u32.ko               u32_classify
  38424    100.000  cls_u32.ko               u32_classify [self]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, this doesn't tell us much more, but I think it's pretty obvious
what cls_u32 is doing :)

> > Am I misinterpreting the results, or does it look like the real problem
> > is actually packet classification?
> 
> Yes, it looks like the problem is your u32 classification setup... Perhaps 
> its not doing what you think its doing...  didn't Jarek provide some hints 
> for you to follow?

I've just realized that I might be hitting the worst-case bucket with
the (ip) destinations I chose for the test traffic. I'll try 

I haven't tried tweaking htb_hysteresis yet (that was one of Jarek's
hints) - it's debatable that it would help since the real problem seems
to be in u32 (not htb), but I'll give it a try anyway.

Another hint was to make sure that "tc class add" goes before
corresponding "tc filter add" - checked: it's ok.

Another interesting hint came from Calin Velea, whose tests suggest that
the overall performance is better with napi turned off, since (rx)
interrupt work is distributed to all cpus/cores. I'll try to replicate
this as soon as I make some small changes to my test setup so that I'm
able to measure overall htb throughput on the egress nic (bps and pps).

Thanks,

Radu Rendec

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html