[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1241012897.7487.12.camel@Maple>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:48:17 -0500
From: John Dykstra <john.dykstra1@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pcnet32@...izon.net, jeff@...zik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] pcnet32: Remove pointless memory barriers
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 22:16 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Any driver where these things are present usually has them
> there for a reason. Usually it's because the SGI guys really
> did run into real problems without them on their huge
> machines which can reorder PCI MMIO wrt. real memory operations.
Is that relevant when the driver doesn't do any MMIO operations? All
pcnet32 register accesses are via PCI I/O space, as implied by the
commit description.
Descriptors and buffers are, of course, in consistent physical memory.
This patch doesn't touch the barriers associated with those structures.
> I don't feel good applying this at all, given that I see no
> evidence that there has been any investigation into how these
> barriers got there in the first place.
Before sending out this patch, I determined that the MMIO barriers were
added as part of NAPI support. I CCed one of the authors of that patch,
so he could NAK if appropriate. I've added the other author on this
reply.
I knew there'd be questions about whether removing these two barriers
was safe. Submitting the patch seemed the best way to understand why
they were needed, if they are.
-- John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists