netdev - Re: [PATCH] sfc: Make temperature warnings/alarms more explicit.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jdb@...x.dk
Cc:	bhutchings@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sfc: Make temperature warnings/alarms more explicit.

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@...x.dk>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:48:04 +0200

> 
> The sfc driver can detect different hardware failures via the
> LM87 system.  One of the failures I have experienced is the
> temperature alarm, but the error message didn't reveal that this
> error was temperature related.  I had to read the code to
> discover that.
> 
> I think that the temperature error should be more explicit, in
> order to warn people before the board is permanently damaged.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk>

Ben, ACK or something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html