netdev - Re: [RFC, PATCH 2.6.29.2] Ethernet V2.0 Configuration Testing Protocol, revision 20090428

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090430.040344.225458257.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	lnx-netdev@...22607b6285f9c5d5ea31ea9d8a7ac.nosense.org
Cc:	shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 2.6.29.2] Ethernet V2.0 Configuration Testing
 Protocol, revision 20090428

From: Mark Smith <lnx-netdev@...22607b6285f9c5d5ea31ea9d8a7ac.nosense.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:09:26 +0930

>> BTW, your email address is rediculious.
> 
> It works, so what's wrong with it? Nobody else has complained about me
> using these types of email addresses on public mailing lists. I can
> throw it away if I get too much spam, pointing the MX record of the
> subdomain to 127.0.0.1 or something similar.

And by using it you can also not get any more replies from me, it
truly is your choice. :-)

I also certainly am never going to apply a patch from you with a
Signed-off-by: or From: that uses one of those throw-away addresses
either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html