netdev - Re: [RFC, PATCH 2.6.29.2] Ethernet V2.0 Configuration Testing Protocol, revision 20090428

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <15079.86467.qm@web32601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@...oo.com.au>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 2.6.29.2] Ethernet V2.0 Configuration Testing  Protocol, revision 20090428

">> BTW, your email address is rediculious.
> 
> It works, so what's wrong with it? Nobody else has complained about me
> using these types of email addresses on public mailing lists. I can
> throw it away if I get too much spam, pointing the MX record of the
> subdomain to 127.0.0.1 or something similar.

And by using it you can also not get any more replies from me, it
truly is your choice. :-)"

That seems a bit silly to me. Isn't the message far more important than how it gets to the recipient, just as long as it does?

Am I the first person ever you're threatening to ignore because you don't like my email address? I can come up with far worse ones, I've got 63 characters in a subdomain to play with :-)

"I also certainly am never going to apply a patch from you with a
Signed-off-by: or From: that uses one of those throw-away addresses
either."

I never expected you to, which is why this email address is in the source and the associated documentation. I just prefer not to use webmail for mailing lists.

      The new Internet Explorer 8 optimised for Yahoo!7: Faster, Safer, Easier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html