netdev - Re: tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090501.090815.262436244.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 01 May 2009 09:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc:	andrew@...dna.net, jelaas@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe)

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 08:14:03 +0200

> [PATCH] net: skb_tx_hash() improvements
> 
> When skb_rx_queue_recorded() is true, we dont want to use jash distribution
> as the device driver exactly told us which queue was selected at RX time.
> jhash makes a statistical shuffle, but this wont work with 8 static inputs.
> 
> Later improvements would be to compute reciprocal value of real_num_tx_queues
> to avoid a divide here. But this computation should be done once,
> when real_num_tx_queues is set. This needs a separate patch, and a new
> field in struct net_device.
> 
> Reported-by: Andrew Dickinson <andrew@...dna.net>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>

Applied, except that I changed the commit message header line to more
reflect that this is in fact a bug fix.

BTW, you don't need the reciprocol when num-tx-queues <= num-rx-queues
(you can just use the RX queue recording as the hash, straight) and
that's the kind of check what I intended to add to net-2.6 had you not
beaten me to this patch.

Also, thanks for giving me absolutely no credit for this whole thing
in your commit message.  I know I do that to you all the time :-/ How
can you forget so quickly that I'm the one that even suggested the
exact code change for Andrew to test in the first place?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html