[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090503.144418.255531526.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 14:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc: andrew@...dna.net, jelaas@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skb_tx_hash() improvements
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 09:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
> Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 11:29:54 +0200
>
>> - } else if (skb->sk && skb->sk->sk_hash) {
>> + /*
>> + * Try to avoid an expensive divide, for symmetric setups :
>> + * number of tx queues of output device ==
>> + * number of rx queues of incoming device
>> + */
>> + if (hash >= dev->real_num_tx_queues)
>> + hash %= dev->real_num_tx_queues;
>> + return hash;
>> + }
>
> Subtraction in a while() loop is almost certainly a lot
> faster.
To move forward on this, I've commited the following to
net-next-2.6, thanks!
net: Avoid modulus in skb_tx_hash() for forwarding case.
Based almost entirely upon a patch by Eric Dumazet.
The common case is to have num-tx-queues <= num_rx_queues
and even if num_tx_queues is larger it will not be significantly
larger.
Therefore, a subtraction loop is always going to be faster than
modulus.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
net/core/dev.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 8144295..3c8073f 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1735,8 +1735,12 @@ u16 skb_tx_hash(const struct net_device *dev, const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
u32 hash;
- if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb))
- return skb_get_rx_queue(skb) % dev->real_num_tx_queues;
+ if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb)) {
+ hash = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
+ while (unlikely (hash >= dev->real_num_tx_queues))
+ hash -= dev->real_num_tx_queues;
+ return hash;
+ }
if (skb->sk && skb->sk->sk_hash)
hash = skb->sk->sk_hash;
--
1.6.2.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists