[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1241448559.6126.110.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 15:49:19 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute2 patch]: Add 'ip tuntap' facility for managing
tun/tap devices
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 07:38 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I would rather provide a netlink for managing TUNTAP interfaces
I'm not sure that makes a lot of sense. We'd be adding a new, duplicate
user API solely for the benefit of iproute2; it's not as if we'd ever be
able to get rid of the existing interface that everyone uses.
Unless you want to ditch the /dev/net/tun chardev completely and do
_everything_ over netlink, maybe... but that doesn't seem particularly
worthwhile either.
> and reorganize under ip link??
It seemed more intuitive to model it after 'ip tunnel'. How would you
want it to look?
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists