netdev - Re: Wrong network usage reported by /proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090504211151.74622f29@python3.es.egwn.lan>
Date:	Mon, 4 May 2009 21:11:51 +0200
From:	Matthias Saou 
	<thias@...m.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Wrong network usage reported by /proc

Eric Dumazet wrote :

> Matthias Saou a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm posting here as a last resort. I've got lots of heavily used RHEL5
> > servers (2.6.18 based) that are reporting all sorts of impossible
> > network usage values through /proc, leading to unrealistic snmp/cacti
> > graphs where the outgoing bandwidth used it higher than the physical
> > interface's maximum speed.
> > 
> > For some details and a test script which compares values from /proc
> > with values from tcpdump :
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489541
> > 
> > The values collected using tcpdump always seem realistic and match the
> > values seen on the remote network equipments. So my obvious conclusion
> > (but possibly wrong given my limited knowledge) is that something is
> > wrong in the kernel, since it's the one exposing the /proc interface.
> > 
> > I've reproduced what seems to be the same problem on recent kernels,
> > including the 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 I'm running right now. The
> > simple python script available here allows to see it quite easily :
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2009-February/msg00166.html
> > 
> >  * I run the script on my Workstation, I have an FTP server enabled
> >  * I download a DVD ISO from a remote workstation : The values match
> >  * I start ping floods from remote workstations : The values reported
> >    by /proc are much higher than the ones reported by tcpdump. I used
> >    "ping -s 500 -f myworkstation" from two remote workstations
> > 
> > If there's anything flawed in my debugging, I'd love to have someone
> > point it out to me. TIA to anyone willing to have a look.
> > 
> > Matthias
> > 
> 
> I could not reproduce this here... what kind of NIC are you using on
> affected systems ? Some ethernet drivers report stats from card itself,
> and I remember seeing some strange stats on some hardware, but I cannot
> remember which one it was (we were reading NULL values instead of
> real ones, once in a while, maybe it was a firmware issue...)

My workstation has a Broadcom BCM5752 (tg3 module). The servers which
are most affected have Intel 82571EB (e1000e). But the issue is that
with /proc, the values are a lot _higher_ than with tcpdump, and the
tcpdump values seem to be the correct ones.

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora release 10 (Cambridge) - Linux kernel
2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 Load : 2.20 0.88 0.42
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html